Obama and His Advisors Not Ready for Primetime

Obama and His Advisors Not Ready for Prime Time
Expert post by Larry C. Johnson of No Quarter

Thanks to this insightful video clip that summarizes succinctly the inept incompetence of the Obama foreign policy team.

Susan Rice, a senior Obama foreign policy advisor, who served on the National Security Council and later as the Assistant Secretary for African Affairs at the State Department under Bill Clinton. We don’t know for sure what Barack or Hillary would do with a “3 a.m.” phone call, but we don’t have to wonder about Susan Rice. She sits on her hands doing nothing.

During her time on the National Security Council, as the senior person responsible for giving the President policy options on Africa, Rice reprised the role of Nero fiddling while Rome burned. She sat by while more than one million Rwandans were butchered in a bloody genocide. She let the phone ring and declined to offer any answer that would have saved lives. And she is one of Barack’s key advisors.

But Rice is wrong about Hillary. Hillary is quite ready to answer the 3am phone call. As someone who has been directly involved with such calls during the Reagan, Bush, and Clinton administrations, I do know what I am talking about.

As I have said before, I have had the opportunity to brief Senator Clinton twice on terrorism and Iraq during the last three years. During the course of my career at the CIA, State Department, and as a consultant, I have briefed in one form or fashion more than 60 members of Congress, a Vice President, and a President. I have participated in briefings for the Joint Chiefs of Staff and other senior military commanders. I entered my first meeting with Hillary with strong reservations about her competence (based entirely on what I had heard and read in the media). I walked out of that meeting very impressed. Hands down, I found her to be the most impressive person I had had the privilege to brief.

Why was I impressed? First and foremost, she listened. I have briefed folks who get the 1000-yard stare–they drift off and start thinking about something else. I also have briefed folks who get the panicked look from not understanding what I am talking about. Hillary was different. She listened intently, but she also grasped the substance and nuance of the issues we were discussing. Second, she asked tough questions that showed me she was genuinely searching for viable policy options. I had a similar experience with Senator Joe Biden, only that was during a hearing.

But unlike many members of Congress who rely on some aide sitting at their side to pump them with questions and information, Hillary could think on her own. She did not need “Foreign Policy for Dummies.”

Hillary also is one of the few members of Congress who understood the difference between Special Forces and and Special Operations Forces. You would be shocked at the number of Senators and Representatives who are supposed to exercise oversight of the military and do not understand this basic point.

When we talk about the “3 a.m.” call we are talking about crisis response operations. Back in July of 1990, the United States was involved in a covert effort to resolve peacefully a coup that involved Libyan-backed terrorists. We had quietly inserted U.S. personnel into the country, the situation was settled without further loss of life, and we were trying to figure out how to withdraw our personnel without exposing them publicly. Our concern about how to cover their withdrawal was made moot when word came that Saddam had just invaded Kuwait. We were taking down one crisis communications task force in the State Department Ops Center as a new one, dedicated to Iraq/Kuwait, was being formed.

What is not well known is that President Bush (senior), Dick Cheney, Colin Powell, and James Baker had been briefed two days earlier in the White House situation room on the impending invasion of Iraq. They were warned that Saddam would likely invade unless the United States made a public declaration to warn him away. The President and his advisors declined at the time to issue such a warning because they believed that if they did so and Saddam invaded, the U.S. would have no choice but to respond militarily. With hindsight we now know that Bush, Cheney, Powell, and Baker screwed up that phone call.

When the phone rings and the President is alerted to the problem, you will want a President whose first instinct is to understand the implication of the threat for U.S. national interests. I know that Hillary understands that point. Barack, by contrast, did not even understand the importance of holding a hearing on NATO’s role in Afghanistan even though he had the full authority to do so.

Once you hang up the phone you need a leader who understands the bureaucratic tools and resources that are available to be brought to bear on the problem. On this point in particular Hillary is light years ahead of Barack. Barack would be hard pressed to explain the difference between DIA, CIA, and NSA. Hillary knows that Washington machinery intimately.

And finally there is the issue of advisors. Let me state again for the record: I am not trying out for a spot on Hillary’s foreign policy team. I am not seeking a job in her administration. I do not want to make the personal sacrifice required to go back into government service–I would have to take a pay cut and work too many long hours. But Hillary is surrounded with a better group of foreign policy advisors. Barack has the likes of Susan Rice and Tony Lake–two of the key folks who failed to respond in a timely matter to the disaster in Rwanda. Hillary, by contrast, has Dick Holbrooke, who helped bring an end to the killing in the Balkans.
About Larry Johnson: Larry C. Johnson is CEO and co-founder of BERG Associates, LLC, an international business-consulting firm with expertise combating terrorism and investigating money laundering. Mr. Johnson works with US military commands in scripting terrorism exercises, briefs on terrorist trends, and conducts undercover investigations on counterfeiting, smuggling and money laundering. Mr. Johnson, who worked previously with the Central Intelligence Agency and U.S. State Department’s Office of Counter Terrorism, is a recognized expert in the fields of terrorism, aviation security, crisis and risk management.

Advertisements

3 comments

  1. Seems to me you are looking for a superman/woman.

    On the subject of a potential Obama administration (or Clinton II’s), there is an interesting project in pure democracy just getting started on the web: automated and continuously updated ‘approval style’ voting on VP, cabinet, and major posts. Approval style voting means you can vote for as many of the choices as you approve. The site will remain open indefinitely for follow up research:
    http://puredem.wordpress.com

  2. »»HILLARY FOR PRESIDENTIST.««
    *
    Hillary Clinton
    for PRESIDENTIST
    of
    THE AMERICAN LOSERS.
    »»:««
    They lose the tooth,
    the tooth they lose,
    and so they lose their teeth
    and all in all smart smiling cheese
    for Hillary.
    *
    Gustav Staedtler.

    *
    »»»»»»»»»»»»»»»:«««««««««««««««
    THEY CALL IT
    POLITICS, RIGHT, RELIGION, ART AND CULTURE
    TO LEAD THE PEOPLE INTO THE TOTAL RUIN.
    »»»»»»»»»»»»»»:««««««««««««««
    !!!. – WITHOUT TRUTH YOU ARE THE LOSER – FOREVER – .!!!
    !!!. – THE HOLY DIVINE JUSTICE-MACHINE IS ROLLING. –
    THE ONE WHO HATES THE TRUTH IS CURSED
    AND WILL BE ELIMINATED – .!!!
    !!!. – WE CAN MAKE A REVOLUTION
    AGAINST THE CORRUPT INSTITUTIONS – .!!!
    !!!. – COME TOGETHER OVER TRUTH – .!!!
    © Gustav Staedtler./.2008./. veritasindeum
    !!!.—- VERITAS — VENI — VIDI — VICI —–.!!!
    »»»»»»»»»:«««««««««
    »»:««

    US-MADMAM
    HILLARY
    FOR
    CRAZYDENT.
    *
    USA-EQUALITY.:
    TEETH FOR EVERYBODY.
    *
    In Indien erkauft der Politiker bei den Armen seine Stimmen mit einer warmen Suppe.
    In den USA erkauft der Politiker sich bei den Armen seine Stimmen mit Zahnersatz und Steuerermaessigung.
    WAS IST DEMOKRATIE.?
    Gustav Staedtler.
    2008
    *
    Zur weiteren Verbreitung freigegeben.

    Read more.:http://truthtotruth.wordpress.com/

  3. Insightful, informational and honest. I’m voting for Obama, but harbor no hard feelings towards Clinton and as you have so eloquently stated, do believe she is a VERY competent and intelligent woman. Thanks for giving me something to actually consider come Nov. 8th and not just another unsubstantiated smear!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s